I liked Sfm models not appearing boy who like tricks
By this point, you will likely have already started SFM and started a new sequence from the pop-up menu that appears on startup. After starting your sequence, the first thing we need to do is load a map to use for your render.
The technique known as structure from motion SfM has been suggested as a valid alternative to traditional photogrammetric methods. In a project in Glasgow, UK, an RTK-based point-to-point validation technique based on two sets of randomly selected ground control points was used to assess the geometric accuracy of SfM technology for 3D terrain mapping over a small area.
SfM photogrammetry is an image processing technique that allows the reconstruction of accurate 3D models from overlapping successive photographs taken from cameras at various angles with or without ground control points GCPs.
These models are not only appealing but also contain spatial information, the quality and accuracy of which depend on both the acquisition method and the processing procedures. The accuracy of an SfM-derived model can be assessed either by comparing it with a reference model or by measuring the deviation of the control points identified on the model. The measurements are taken using classic topographic survey methods and survey instruments of higher accuracy.
To contribute to the knowledge of applicability, a real-time kinematic RTK -based point-to-point validation technique based on two sets of randomly selected GCPs has been used to assess the geometric accuracy of SfM technology for 3D terrain mapping over a small area. Typically, network RTK solutions within the United Kingdom provide instantaneous that is, single epoch coordinate solutions that achieve root mean square accuracies of around mm in horizontal position XY and mm in elevation Zwith relatively small biases.
Measurement of rock t surfaces by using smartphone structure from motion (sfm) photogrammetry
This result clearly shows a high level of accuracy and good data quality. Therefore, it was considered to be fit for purpose as reference data. Figure 1: Flight plan showing GCPs targets and camera locations in the study area, with the green line following the position of the cameras starting from the home point. The flight path was predefined on the drone mapping software. The home point of the drone was set from a zero base at one point and the images were captured in sequence according to the grid pattern shown in Figure 1 in order to ensure good coverage and visibility.
The flying height of 60m was chosen to ensure that a high-resolution dataset was captured whilst avoiding any interference of the drone with the surrounding trees. This also enabled the optimum acquisition of photos and minimized the processing time. All the images captured were geolocated and a ground sampling distance of 2.
The processing workflow started with the initial processing that handles the image alignment and produces sparse point clouds. For this project, half image size was selected for two reasons: i to reduce the processing time, and ii to address the low texture in the captured images to improve the outputs. The processing report revealed that the georeferencing accuracy was within acceptable limits with mean RMSE of 27mm.
The next stage was the point cloud densification. Here, a resampling to a quarter of the original resolution was used based on the recommendation for projects with vegetation. For each input image, a final point cloud was automatically saved to Lidar file format.
Finally, both the raster DSM and orthomosaic were generated and the tiles were merged and saved in a lossless compression format of GeoTiff. Figure 2: Digital surface model DSM and orthomosaic generated in the study area. Validation test There are three known validation methods for SfM data points: i point to point data points that compare two point clouds directlyii point to raster data points that compare SfM-derived rasters such as DSMs with points from topographic data, e. GNSS and total stations, and iii raster to raster data points that compare SfM-derived DSMs with equivalent raster-based data products derived from another survey technique such as terrestrial laser scanning.
However, the choice of validation method is dependent on the available reference data. Since the reference dataset was based on the RTK GNSS-derived coordinates of the target cross-hair, a point-to-point validation method was adopted. The point-to-point validation was done in two ways; firstly by using five of the GCPs as checkpoints, and secondly by using the remaining ten. This was done to evaluate the influence of the of checkpoints on the root mean square errors RMSEs obtained. The obtained when ten checkpoints were used fell within the expected range However, when five checkpoints were used, slightly higher RMSEs were obtained The 3D point cloud produced is shown in Figure 3.
This result is very interesting given the level of detail shown. However, as seen in the inset Athere were some black areas gaps caused by shadows from some trees. The gaps occurred in those areas due to insufficient camera viewpoints. This implies that better can be achieved if some of the initial parameters such as the overlap front and side and the flying height 60m are varied.
However, these variations may also be at the expense of the storage capability and the processing speed due to the large volume of data that will be involved. Nonetheless, the principle of economy of accuracy — that is, establishing a balance between cost and accuracy — is expected in every project. Thus, it was also considered in this study.
Conclusion This article has examined the application of SfM photogrammetry for 3D terrain mapping. Relevant factors such as overlap, the flying height and ground control points were considered in the assessment. The validation tests suggest that higher s of checkpoints, evenly distributed within the study area, could increase the Sfm models not appearing of the model. However, further analysis would be required to test not only the influence of the of ground control points on the accuracy, but also their configuration.
To avoid black areas gaps in the model, it is imperative to have many camera viewpoints and an adequate of GCPs distributed evenly within the area of interest. Generally, it is to be noted in line with literature that the quality of the data captured is dependent on the methodology adopted and should be taken into consideration. Figure 3: 3D point cloud reconstruction showing the gaps in the study area.
Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, where the fieldwork for this article was conducted as part of coursework in the Geospatial and Mapping Sciences programme. A special thanks and appreciation go to Pix4D Support who made their help files freely available and accessible. Further reading Iheaturu, C. An assessment of the accuracy of structure from motion SfM photogrammetry for 3D terrain mapping. Geomatics, Land Management and Landscape2, 65— Add some geo.
Receive a weekly summary of the biggest news, along with the best stories, case studies, and key market insights. Download this article as a print friendly PDF and receive our weekly overview of the most important geomatics news and insightful articles and case studies. Already subscribed or no desire to subscribe to our newsletter? Skip this step and head to the download directly. Ofcourse we encourage you to share this article with your peers if you enjoyed reading it. Copy the URL below or share it on your social media of choice.
Sfm: how to import models, cameras, maps, and attach custom models to players
This article was featured in. Read Issue. Issue Archive. Make your inbox more interesting. Make your inbox more interesting Receive a weekly summary of the biggest news, along with the best stories, case studies, and key market insights. Up. Download PDF or Print Download this article as a print friendly PDF and receive our weekly overview of the most important geomatics news and insightful articles and case studies.
Common issues and questions
Last name. address. Sharing this article Ofcourse we encourage you to share this article with your peers if you enjoyed reading it. Or manually copy and paste the URL.